ZACHFRANZEN

Archive for 2010

Drawing for a Painting

In Art on March 7, 2010 at 12:52 am

Finished some storyboard revisions this week, and haven’t had much of a chance to post until now.  This is a drawing for a small painting I’m going to do.

I’ve been reading boy and dog stories lately, Henry Huggins, Henry and Ribsy, by Beverly Cleary, and Ginger Pye by Eleanor Estes.  I like the innocence of the Youth Fiction of the 50s and 60s.  I also like that the stories are super interesting and that the kids are responsible and outward focused.  Don’t get me wrong, I like the glorification of pagan-angsty-selfish-outcast-teenagers as much as the next guy, provided the next guy doesn’t like them at all.  Anyway, that’s neither here nor there.  I wanted this composition to be sort of poster-like, so I based it off the telescoping circle thing found in art nouveau jewelry.

This thing:

Not too subtle, I know.  The red circles are completely unnecessary, because it’s so obvious.

I hope to paint it up in the next week or so.  Keep you posted.

Machiavelli is the Devil

In Art on February 27, 2010 at 8:13 pm

I was in Columbia the other day and I bought a book called 10 Books That Screwed Up The World: And 5 Others That Didn’t Help. Benjamin Wiker, the author, examines 15 foundational books that persuasively justify bad ideas.  Mr. Wiker suggests that the best way to inoculate one’s self from these ideologically diseased works is to read them.  In case you’re unpersuaded that this is necessary, Wiker explores  the arguments of each of the books and alerts the reader to their trendy current mutation.  The chapters are long enough to give you serious food for thought, but short enough to reach a wide audience. Mr. Wiker is a good stylist and he deftly distills abstract thoughts into concrete sentences.  His first chapter is a punchy take on Niccolo Machiavelli’s infamous book The Prince.  I like what he has to say so much that I did this painting.

The Prince is both controversial and strangely popular.  It is controversial because it rationalizes the separation of power from ethics and popular because many folks want this rationalization.  Wiker writes, “Machiavelli knew evil.  But then, so did many others, in many other times and places … What makes Machiavelli different is that he looked evil in the face and smiled.  That friendly smile and a wink is The Prince.”

Here’s how the worship of power seems to unfold.  Power seduces because we prefer “what is mine” to “what is right.”  The more personalized our moral code, the harder it is to do wrong.  Since we think highly of our personal virtue, we give our desires little scrutiny.  Soon, we focus our energies to acquire power so we can do what we want i.e. “good.”  In the end, our attempts at Utopia kill 6 million Jews, or 100 million dissenters, or we fly a plane full of innocents into a building full of innocents.  Such actions get the thumbs up from Machiavelli.  Wiker says, “Machiavelli convinces the reader that great evils, unspeakable crimes, foul deeds are not only excusable but praiseworthy if they are done in the service of some good.  Since this advice occurs in the context of atheism, then there are no limits on the kind of evil one can do if he thinks he is somehow benefitting humanity.”‘

Machiavelli is a devil because he repeats the old lie that the ends justify the means.  It’s not new.

Matt 4:8-9

“Again, the devil took him [Jesus] to a high mountain and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their glory.  And he said to him, ‘All these I will give you, if you will fall down and worship me.’”

Here is Wiker’s succinct take on Machiavelli:

“His great classic The Prince is a monument of wicked counsel, meant for rulers who had shed all moral and religious scruples and were therefore daring enough to believe that evil–deep, dark, and almost unthinkable evil–is often more effective than good.”

In conclusion Mr. Wiker contends that Machiavelli lit the fuse that runs through Rousseau, and Marx, and Nietzsche, and that ultimately set off the powder keg of the 20th century.  He fathered the lie in political science that was first told by the father of lies: “It is best to exchange personal goodness for personal power.”  Thumbs down for Machiavelli.

Work in Progress shot:

SAM FORCE 2

In Art on February 23, 2010 at 12:20 am

More than one writer has compared Mustache Jones to Slappy Malloy.  In his 1998 book, Sam Force to GIJOE: Television in the Age of Reagan, Henry Sallow remarks, “For those aware of the players, the similarities between Stewart Malloy and Mustache Jones are manifold.”  Sallow goes on to suggest that the polemical argumentative nature of the show mirrors the interaction between Slappy and his Marxist roommate, Shelby Rodenburg.

Though initially quite good friends, the political divide became personal, and they pursued projects aimed at the other’s displeasure.  Sam Force promoted a Pro-Nuclear, “Peace through Strength” agenda with such ferocity that many networks feared a political backlash.  Had Malloy been less strident, Sam Force might have pre-empted the success of GIJOE.  Still without the training ground of Sam Force, GIJOE would have never found its voice.

While Slappy worked on his Sam Force proposal, Shelby Rodenburg found the perfect vehicle for his Marxist leanings in a Belgian comic called The Smurfs.  Released in 1981, The Smurf television show demonstrated a communal, currency-free society ruled by a benign, red-clad, Marx-bearded, Papa Smurf.  If that weren’t enough to annoy Slappy Malloy, Rodenburg emphasized Gargamel, a greedy capitalist villain who desperately wanted to commodify the Smurfs and turn them into gold.  It is possible that the audience for such a heavily Marxist allegory was not principally America’s children.  Rather, it is entirely feasible that Smurf preachiness was intended to provoke the free-market-loving, Milton-Friedman-worshipping, Slappy Malloy.

Not surprisingly the tension between the two roommates found its way into Slappy Malloy’s script.  Below is a page from the SamForce pilot where Mustache Jones (Malloy’s counterpart) dukes it out with Comrade Crimson (Rodenburg’s counterpart?).

One can only wonder what the show might have gone on to reveal had it been allowed to continue.  I think I can say without fear of contradiction that the show behind the show is far more interesting and had it been more widely known Sam Force might still be running today.

SAM FORCE

In Art on February 18, 2010 at 7:38 pm

In 1978 during the height of the Cold War, Stewart (Slappy) Malloy devised a television series for kids that dramatized the fighting forces of the United States against those of the Soviet Union.  Motivated by a frustration toward the Carter administration’s apologetic posture and what he deemed a weak foreign policy, Slappy Malloy proposed a television show called “Sam Force” that would promote patriotism and restore pride in the armed forces.  Every week “Sam Force” was to fight “The Red Thumb” a proxy Soviet empire.  The show never made it beyond its pilot episode, and in 1979 Slappy Malloy was recruited by Hasbro to revitalize the wilting GIJOE franchise.

Above is the front of a proposed trading card.  It features Natasha Plotnikova, a Red Thumb villainess.  She is an agent skilled in the passive aggressive arts.  The back of the card lists her weapons as pouty lips and a sullen expression.  Furthermore, she makes her enemies feel guilty almost at will.  Plotnikova appeared briefly in an interrogation scene during the pilot episode.

Ah, what might have been.

In the words of the Sam Force Theme Song:

The Sam Force forever, hurrah, boys, hurrah!

Down with the traitor, and crush the red star.

Cover Me

In Art on February 17, 2010 at 3:58 am

Sketches, underpainting, and final cover.

Title of my Blog Post

In Art on February 8, 2010 at 3:17 pm

Here’s something I started a while ago and just revisited.

I had a busy weekend and I uploaded some cover revisions and storyboards this morning.  So for the rest of the day I’m just doing some blog stuff and kicking back before I start on the underpainting for a cover tomorrow.

I get really frustrated with storyboards sometimes because I want to impress the client with a great vision of the script and really top notch drawings, but the working time always gets a little cramped, and panels that I want to render like this:

end up like this:

or this:

I’m actually pleased with some of the work, but I can’t put it on my blog because it’s for a video game that comes out in a billion years.  If I put up any of the work, the Play Station folks will actually get in a time machine, kill my parents, and I’ll never get born.  Seriously, they’re the mafia, but with time machines and lots of first person shooter experience.

P & P

In Art on January 29, 2010 at 6:08 pm

P&Pblog2

The colors are a little bit gross, but I’m ready to move on.

Underpainting

In Art on January 27, 2010 at 2:35 pm

pride and prejudice underpainting-Zach Franzen

Pride and Prejudice Drawing

In Art on January 23, 2010 at 3:09 pm

Pride and Prejudice-z franzen

Sweet Korean Box

In Uncategorized on January 21, 2010 at 5:03 pm

Photo 72

A couple months ago I did some storyboards for a 7 minute advertisement.  The ad was for Prudential South Korea, and I got to work with Cory, Del, Danny, and Breakfast Film’s DK.  It was fun.  The story was kind of … um… Asian?  I guess?  It would sort of take a sharp turn into fantasy land and then nose dive into the horrors of the industrial revolution.  Anyway, I like storyboarding, I’ve been able to do some minor projects, a couple commercials, and a cinematic video game intro, still I’m always a little frustrated by how fast the drawings have to be turned around.  The volume of drawings, their transitory disposable nature, and the fast approaching deadlines lead to some really rough panels.  The Prudential piece was no different:

Picture 9

Picture 1

Picture 2

Picture 3

Picture 6

Picture 7

Picture 5

Picture 4

And these aren’t even the worst!  Anyway, the point in storyboarding really isn’t the drawings independently.  It’s the sequence.  Thankfully, the client liked them fine.

Last night when I came home I had a treasure waiting for me from the fine folks in Korea.  They sent me a beautifully wrapped box.  It came with a sheet of paper that described what it is.  I think it’s called Najeon Chilgi, and it’s beautiful.

Photo 76

Even though I look like I just rolled out of an alley in this picture.  The box made me feel like a top notch diplomat.  When I opened the little lacquered drawers, out seeped feelings of peace and goodwill from the dear people in South Korea.

Bring Out the Old

In Art on January 20, 2010 at 4:49 pm

Here’s an old weird incomprehensible drawing I did some time ago.  It accompanied an old post (below) on Portland’s blog.

western civblog zach franzen

Advocates of Western civilization increasingly suffer bewilderment.  It is the type of bewilderment described in a nightmare of Malcolm Muggerridge.  The setting is backstage in a theater.  As he waits in the wings for his cue, he hears the play bumbling along.  Suddenly he realizes that the play he hears is not the play to which he has a script.  “Panic seizes me; I wonder frenziedly what I should do.  Then I get my cue.  Stumbling, falling over the unfamiliar scenery, I make my way onto the stage, and there look for guidance to the prompter, whose head I can just see rising out of the floor boards.  Alas, he only signals helplessly to me, and I realise that of course his script is different from mine.  I begin to speak my lines, but they are incomprehensible to the other actors and abhorrent to the audience who begin to hiss and shout: ‘Get off the stage!’ ‘Let the play go on!’ ‘You’re interrupting!’   I am paralysed and can think of nothing to do but to go on standing there and speaking my lines that don’t fit.  The only lines I know.”

This happened to Mark Helprin when he clashed with an audience from a university town in Massachusetts.  “By some quirk which I hope never to see reproduced, and before I knew what was happening, I found myself debating my entire audience on the subjects of human sacrifice and cannibalism. These well-educated and polite people — only a few of whom would actually have murdered or eaten one another — who had sons and daughters, Ph.D.s, and BMWs, were defending the Mayan and Aztec practice of human sacrifice — that is, in the main, of children — and the South Sea custom of cannibalism.”  Helprin suggests that when faced with the option to defend Western Civilization or cannibalism, it is more fashionable to defend cannibalism.

The legendary American literary critic Leslie Fielder once wrote:

“We continue to insist that change is progress, self-indulgence is freedom and novelty is originality.  In these circumstances it’s difficult to avoid the conclusion  that Western man has decided to abolish himself, creating his own boredom out of his own affluence, his own vulnerability out of his own strength, his own impotence out of his own erotomania, himself blowing the trumpet that brings the walls of his city crumbling down.”

Leslie Fielder wrote this well before Jesse Jackson led Stanford University students in the chant: “Hey, Hey, Ho, Ho, Western Civ Has Got to Go.”  Fielder also wrote it before the University of Chicago ignored its student council, both of its student papers, it’s alumni (including Nobel Prize winning novelist Saul Bellow), the National Association of Scholars, and decided to phase out its popular and celebrated History of Western Civilization class.  University of Chicago president Don Randel seemed to believe that an appreciation for our culture was a 19th century phenomena that we’ve moved beyond.

Sometimes one can find a fellow cast member who possesses the same script.  I feel that Mark Helprin, the previously mentioned novelist, is such a fellow.  In a 2002 commencement speech, he expanded Clarence Darrow’s charge to the class of 1918.  Darrow commanded, “Get out of here, and go swimming.”  Helprin lengthened this by a third: “Get out of here, go swimming, and save Western Civilization.”

Here’s an excerpt from his beautiful speech:

If civilization can be attacked on many fronts, it can also be defended on many fronts, and to do so you need not necessarily drop into Afghanistan by parachute or found a political party. Last summer, in Venice, I was walking from room to room in the Accademia, which, unlike timid American museums, throws its windows wide open to the light and air of day. As if to bring even further alive the greatness and truth of the Bellinis and the Giorgiones on the walls, the galleries were flooded with music. As is most everything in Italy, it was unofficial. It came from a guitarist and a soprano on a side street. He played while she sang — gloriously — Bach, Handel, Mozart, and anonymous folk songs of the 18th Century. Because it was music, I cannot properly convey to you how beautiful it was, but it was accomplished, precise, and infused with the ineffable quality that lifts great art above that which merely aspires to or pretends to be great art. I could not see them from the windows, but when, several hours later, I went outside, they had neither ceased, nor skipped a beat, nor produced a single false note.

They were impoverished Poles, who appeared to be in their late twenties. She was thin, sharp-featured, and hauntingly beautiful. Most people simply passed them by, some dropped a few coins in a basket at her feet, and the visitors to the Accademia had no idea who they were, but she sang as if she were bathed in the footlights of La Scala, where she should have been, and where someday she may be. It did not matter that they were unrecognized, that they sang on the street, or that they were desperately poor, because that day in Venice they rose above everyone else, except perhaps the saints. In this they shared a brotherhood with the American soldier who made the first parachute jump, in the dark, into Afghanistan. For they and he were defending the civilization of the West, and they and he are inextricably linked. Without the soldier, they could not exist except in subjugation, and without them, he would not have enough to fight for.

I ask you to join this brotherhood, and, in your own way, whatever that may be, to defend and champion the sanctity of the individual, free and objective inquiry, government by consent of the governed, freedom of conscience, and the pursuit — rather than the degradation and denial — of truth and of beauty.

Sketch and Final

In Art on January 15, 2010 at 4:42 pm

Picture 36

Picture 46

This is a recent job.  Below are screen caps of the quick idea sketch in Photoshop followed by a progress shot and a final.  I started to draw the girl with her hands up on her head.  I realized that I’d need to change the face to look more angry/frustrated and less tired, but I liked the tired expression more, so I changed her posture to match her face.  Not the most direct route, but I think it turned out okay.

Picture 33

Picture 34

Picture 3

Teacher Spot Art

In Art on January 4, 2010 at 12:47 pm

teacher color - zach franzen