John Owen Underpainting

John Owen illustration based on Greenhill's portrait

This is the underpainting to a slightly caricatured portrait of the Puritan John Owen (based on Greenhill’s painting).  I didn’t rub in a mid tone.  Normally I do, but I put so much matte medium on the paper (which is sort of like Elmer’s glue) that it obscured the drawing a little.  I worried that a mid tone would obliterate the drawing altogether so I just painted the face and I’ll scrub in the background during the color stage.

Robert E. Lee

Today is a historic civil war date.  It marks the death of John Wilkes Booth, the surrender of General Joseph E. Johnston’s army to General William Tecumseh Sherman, and Confederate Memorial Day, observed officially in seven States.

It is an entirely unexpected coincidence that my post of the finished the picture of Robert E. Lee falls on Confederate Memorial Day.  I started the painting after reading about Lee and Lincoln in Paul Johnson’s book Heroes and with the desire to compliment my Lincoln painting.

Chapter eight of Heroes describes both Lincoln and Lee as “Two Kinds of Nobility.”  Both men were fiercely ambitious, but it seems Lee’s ambition arose to suppress a legacy of shame.  His father was a revolutionary war general and a governor of Virginia.  According to Johnson, he became a dishonest land speculator, was jailed twice, and declared bankruptcy.  He fled to the Caribbean when young Robert was six and he never returned.

Here’s what Johnson writes, “Robert E. Lee seems to have set himself up, quite deliberately, to redeem the family honor by leading an exemplary life of public service. ‘Honor,’ a word he pronounced with a special loving emphasis, putting a stress on each syllable, meant everything to him.  His dedication to honor made him a peculiarly suitable person to become the equivalent to the South of Lincoln, sanctifying its cause by personal probity and virtuous inspiration.”

When South Carolina seceded, all eyes looked to Virginia to see which way the Old Dominion would side.  It is said that Lee denounced secession privately in letters, and saw it as a betrayal of the Founder’s first principles.  When asked if he would fight for the Confederacy, Lee replied “I shall never bear arms against the Union, but it may be necessary for me to carry a musket in the defense of my native state, Virginia, in which case I shall not prove recreant to my duty.” At the recommendation of Winfield Scott, Lincoln offered Lee a top command in the forthcoming Union army, but when the Old Dominion voted for secession, Lee refused Lincoln’s offer.  He said, “I prize the Union very highly and know of no personal sacrifice I would not make to preserve it, save that of honour.”  Unlike his father, Lee it seems, would not break his commitments or otherwise embarrass the State of Virginia.  Two days after Lincoln’s offer, Lee resigned from the U.S. Army.  Three days after that, he took command of Virginia’s State forces.

In an 1874 speech before the Southern Historical Society in Atlanta, Benjamin Harvey Hill remarked that Lee “… was a Ceasar, without his ambition; Fredrick, without his tyranny; Napoleon, without his selfishness, and Washington, without his reward.”

In the end Lincoln and Lee are the fitting tragic heroes in a war shot through with tragedy.

EDIT: Thanks to Justin for taking pictures of my painting with his space camera.


I found these drawings when I was looking for some papers to complete my taxes.  They’re a couple years old.  They’re some sketches for a story where a mural falls in love with a painting of an orphan girl in fancy dress.  I like the second one best.

Lee Painting Work In Progress

The colors are a bit vibrant.  I’ve got to finish the General’s coat and pants and then recede some of the colors.  Also, I should probably neutralize the background a bit.  Lot of little loose ends today kept me distracted from the painting, Hopefully I can get most of it done tomorrow.


Here’s a quick job I did for Timberlake Baptist Church in Lynchburg Virginia this weekend.

(As it turns out Lynchburg was named for its founder John Lynch [ferry service entrepreneur who first settled the town in 1757] and not after a walled town famous for lynching.  However, it is possible that John Lynch was related to Captain William Lynch (1742-1820), who claimed to have invented the term.  Though, it is more likely that the term “lynch” was coined by the more well-known Charles Lynch who suppressed a Loyalist uprising in 1780 with extralegal actions that, strangely enough, did not include hanging.  And to be fair, Charles Lynch might have also been related to John Lynch, the founder of Lynchburg).

Anyway, I worked a little longer on these trees than I should of, and it’s because I jumped into the project without a plan.  It’s stupid to not take some time to plan, especially when the deadline’s tight.  Live and learn.